Did the Tea Party win the debate over the N-word accusations? - Washington Examiner
No, I don't believe Breitbart and the Tea Party crowd have won much of anything, here. For all his bluster, @andrewbreitbart has no more proof that the incident never happened than the congressmen have that it did.
Sure, it would be nice if there were some kinda audio or video footage conclusively proving the words were or were not spoken, but I'm pretty sure that trees falling in the middle of the forest make noise, even when no one captures the sound on tape. And as the great 'pubbie philosopher once said, "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."
The eye witness testimony of the congressmen--and the tea party protesters, too--is apparently the only evidence there is, and after that, it all comes down to who we each find more credible. It's not surprising that for activists, anyway, the divide between who folks find more trustworthy falls along partisan lines.
Neocons:Munich :: Austerians:Stagflation - Matt O’Brien is correct: I checked, and re-checked, and triple-checked, and I can confirm that it’s not 1979 anymore. Now, that shouldn’t be too surprising...
25 minutes ago